So, for example, if you have a Smart Material for a Cobblestone texture, you can paint + sculpt an object with it, using a single click (the FILL tool in the Paint tools) or brushstroke. Nevertheless, AMD CPU's are fantastic at most everything else and it seems unfair to be penalized because the Multi-threading in 3DCoat and other apps use an Intel compiler. 2) You can PBR texture paint and sculpt (especially when using Smart Materials), simultaneously, in 3DCoat. 3DCoat is the application that has all the tools you need to take your 3D idea. When exporting textures, it opens an entirely different, somewhat disjointed window. When I export meshes with 3D Coat, it opens the Windows Explorer window as used to. I reported this issue to him a few years ago, and he said he might look at using another compiler, but switching could be a massive undertaking. Forum Cylinder Correction along X and Y axis at the same time. 3D Coat forum 3D Sculpting community modeling sculpting printing rendering Go to topic discussion. If anyone is having similar issues, please let Andrew know about it. Therefore, it can make AMD CPU's seem slow when these Intel tools are used. I think the common denominator is that some applications use Intel's compilers or libraries.which are optimized for Intel CPU's only. What matters is how well that piece of hardware is optimized for the OS. That's an important distinction because, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter if something seems more promising on paper. I'm saying it performs worse with the 3D software I use on Windows. The sculpting feels amazing, the topology and UV tools are fantastic and the painting is hands down the best ever for hand. To be clear: I'm not saying AMD is worse than Intel. 3D Coat is amazing (and im shocked about some criticisms towards it) How come this software is so unknown This has been the most pleasant experience ive EVER had with any 3D software yet (and ive tried quite a few). I'll surely stick to Intel for my next build. I compared the 2 Plugins, which is newer. Now I used the plugin that is shipped with 3DCoat. I've been an Intel user for years, the 1950x was my first AMD CPU. I finally read my own walkthrough, which now I can say is still working -3DC2BlenderApplinkObjects Folder is for the Files, but in Blender set: C:UsersUserDocumentsAppLinks3D-CoatExchange. ![]() X-Particles for C4D suffered the same fate, painfully slow compared to cheaper Intel CPUs. Another example of how fuss not necessarily equals facts. At the time when it came out, on every 3d forum, it was welcomed as the Intel killer. My threadripper worked ok, but I can't say it met the expectations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |